> Is the intent behind child support laws "a desire to punish men for choosing to have sex"? Irrelevant comparison. There is no procedure to legally "undo" a c

> Is the intent behind child support laws "a desire to punish men for choosing to have sex"? Irrelevant comparison. There is no procedure to legally "undo" a child who has been born, in which case one should pursue the wellbeing of the child (which may or may not be well-served by child support laws). However, if a child has not yet been born, and the child is not wanted, abortion prevents health risks to the mother, while also preventing an unwanted child from a life of hardship. If there's a procedure that helps everyone involved, why not do it? > If a person refuses to take a COVID-19 vaccine, and does not have COVID, should doctors Bro this makes no sense at all. If the patient doesn't have COVID, then the decision to not take the vaccine has no bearing on their elective treatments. If a woman has sex, she has not surrendered the right to her body.