> I'm sorry but it really is not a nuanced issue. So you would support an abortion procedure on a fetus after 8 months and two weeks of pregnancy? If you belie

> I'm sorry but it really is not a nuanced issue. So you would support an abortion procedure on a fetus after 8 months and two weeks of pregnancy? If you believe this to not be a nuanced issue, then are you in opposition to the original Roe vs Wade ruling that determined personhood for a fetus once it reaches a viable age for survival, and you instead support the ability to abort a fetus all the way up to the moments before birth? > There is no need to defend these people as some sort of morally principled people confused by the underlying nuances. I'm confused which one of my comments leads you to believe I'm defending the anti-abortion crowd. I was responding to a comment saying that this is an issue of bodily autonomy rights only. It's not. There are the rights of the unborn child at play as well, hence the nuance.