So you want to force women to die and easily preventable death (e.g. ectopic pregnancy)? That's the only way "completely correct" works here - the trigger laws

So you want to force women to die and easily preventable death (e.g. ectopic pregnancy)? That's the only way "completely correct" works here - the trigger laws on the books that result in that outcome were in place before the court took this case. They chose to rule broadly rather than a ruling that still enshrined the right of someone to have a medical procedure that would preserve their life say in the case of a non-viable pregnancy that would end in the death of both the woman and the fetus. edit: i was wrong about the trigger laws having exceptions for life endangering pregnancies - its the new laws the same people are passing that remove the exceptions. I still stand by my statement, because the "completely correct" ruling allows those exceptions to be removed.