>Haskell is equal or better (sometimes significantly so) in almost every relevant domain. For domains in which ocaml is a better choice, it is not the globally

>Haskell is equal or better (sometimes significantly so) in almost every relevant domain. For domains in which ocaml is a better choice, it is not the globally best choice (i.e. both ocaml and haskell are bad in those domains). I think this assertion is false, but it would take a lot of careful evaluation to prove it one way or the other. The most salient counterexample that comes to mind is modularity and namespacing. Of course it's possible I'm wrong, and Haskell is objectively superior in every regard. But the OCaml language and ecosystem has [a decades long track record of stable and evident success stories](https://ocaml.org/industrial-users https://ocaml.org/industrial-users) and I find it well suited for the kinds of problems I like to tackle. I also like the prevailing vibe in the (still) small community. This exchange reminds of a difference I've observed in the cultural tendencies in the OCaml and Haskell ecosystems: in my experience, OCamlers tend to not be very invested in arguing for the supremacy of OCaml.