3 ms·
Indeed it is -- the ruling is about the fundamental right to privacy with regards to bodily autonomy. Without some major federal precedent like Roe V. Wade, sta
by f38zf5vdt 4y ago
Indeed it is -- the ruling is about the fundamental right to privacy with regards to bodily autonomy. Without some major federal precedent like Roe V. Wade, states are free to impose to their medical will on their populace as they see fit.
- endisneigh 4y agoThe right to privacy is not related directly contraceptions. Alito said as much in the opinion.