3 ms·
You just ignored everything that I said. I was responding to you making the false claim that users can just choose to use chrome, in the competitive market. T
by stale2002 4y ago
You just ignored everything that I said.
I was responding to you making the false claim that users can just choose to use chrome, in the competitive market.
That's not true because Apple anti-competitively prevents users from installing the real version of chrome, that isn't handicapped.
And then I used the analogy of Microsoft banning all competing browsers, which I'd hope you agree is and should be illegal.
- masswerk 4y agoThe point being, it doesn't run just one way and it works in multiple ways. And, BTW, users can choose to use another mobile OS, by the very same vendor bringing you Chrome, and no, you can't run Safari on that OS. And that OS has already more users than the other one.
- stale2002 4y ago> it doesn't run just one way So then you agree completely with me that apple is engaging is some anti-competitive practices, you just think other people are also engaging in anti-competitive practices. That doesn't refute my point. You are agreeing with me that yes Apple engages in anti-competitive practices that limit user choice. So back to the original point. You said this "if the best product wins in a competitive marketplace". This statement is false because Apple is engaging in anti competitive practices that prevent a competitive market from happening. So that is "where the problem is". The problem is the anti competitive practices that you agree with me that Apple is engaging in.