4 ms·
It wasn't disinformation. It was no secret that one of the reasons masks weren't recommended for general public use was that hospitals and clinics should be sup
by epgui 4y ago
It wasn't disinformation. It was no secret that one of the reasons masks weren't recommended for general public use was that hospitals and clinics should be supplied as a priority.
If you got a different impression than this message, blame wherever you get your news from.
- pseudo0 4y agoWhat, the US Surgeon General? https://archive.ph/KgfXW https://archive.ph/KgfXW > Seriously people- STOP BUYING MASKS! > They are NOT effective in preventing general public from catching #Coronavirus, but if healthcare providers can’t get them to care for sick patients, it puts them and our communities at risk! It's hard to get more direct than that. It wasn't just about preserving supply for healthcare workers, high-level government officials were explicitly stating that masks were not effective for the general public. Fortunately we have archives of all this stuff, as many statements (like this one) were later deleted.
- epgui 4y agoThat sounds 100% compatible with what I wrote. You will also note that in the early pandemic, it was completely unclear that non-N95 masks, such as surgical masks (let alone cotton masks) would have a positive benefit. That changed later on, of course. That statement reflected the best information available at the time, but it was designed to be as simple and actionable as possible, not to communicate highly-technical nuance.
- ssully 4y agoSeriously. I can find social media posts of friends in April of 2020 sewing cloth masks to donate to hospitals/medical clinics to help them backfill their mask shortages.
- jcrash 4y agoMultiple sources in USA claimed masks were not needed for people without the disease. Heavily implying it was useless. I of course knew that was BS from the get-go. But nonetheless they did say it. https://time.com/5794729/coronavirus-face-masks/ https://time.com/5794729/coronavirus-face-masks/