3 ms·

The privacy aspect is simple. You have no right to know anything about my discussions with my doctor nor to dictate courses of action. The same people who (fal

• lkjdsklf 4y ago
  The privacy argument is tenuous at best. We regulate how and what medical procedures can be performed all the time. > The same people who (falsely) screamed about vaccine mandates being a HIPAA violation sure don't give a fuck about that now. If you're going to make the argument that privacy requirements protect abortion procedures, then that would also mean that vaccine mandates are not allowed for the same reason. You can't have it both ways.
• dahfizz 4y ago
  > The privacy aspect is simple. You have no right to know anything about my discussions with my doctor nor to dictate courses of action. This is a pretty weak argument which could be used to justify any number of things. Can you rape or murder behind closed doors, and invoke the right to privacy when the authorities try to stop you? Just because X happens in private doesn't make it legal and protected by privacy rights. There are plenty of illegal medical procedures. You can't have a doctor remove a kidney and help you sell it, for example.
  • ModernMech 4y ago
    There are different levels of privacy. The government coming into your home is a much different violation of privacy than the government coming into your body.