3 ms·

You, with a straight face, are trying to say that a government restricting your rights is totally the same as the policy of an employer? And you're telling me

You, with a straight face, are trying to say that a government restricting your rights is totally the same as the policy of an employer? And you're telling me that a vaccine which is obscenely safe, you are more likely to die from tripping down the stairs in your own home than you are to die from the vaccine, is totally the same as childbirth? Where nearly 1000 women die every year, many are left with serious conditions, where women are left in poverty where they can't care for those children. Come on. Your position is beyond absurd.

xienze 4y ago
My position is that you cannot claim women are “forced” to give birth (they have options) if, like the parent, you claim that no one was “forced” to take a vaccine they didn’t want (they have the option of losing their job). It’s a matter of double standards here. People get all up in arms when you point out that you can still get an abortion if you just travel out of state. But if you point out that your only way to avoid taking a vaccine you don’t want is to lose your job, well no one is “forcing” you to take it! Likewise, I say it’s disingenuous to claim you’re forced to have an unwanted child. You just have to travel to another state. That’s a helluva lot easier to swallow than losing your job. Just drop the phrase “forced to” around abortion is all I’m saying.
- eropple 4y ago
  Texas has specifically enabled random citizens as third parties to cripple the futures of women who get abortions across state lines by suing them in Texas civil courts. This is a disingenous line of argument and you demean yourself with it to support an absolutely brainwormed kind of conspiracism.