3 ms·
That.. seems excessively alarmist. It is on par with Sirius XM Channel channel reacting to the news by saying, and I am paraphrasing, 'they are going after all
by A4ET8a8uTh0 4y ago
That.. seems excessively alarmist. It is on par with Sirius XM Channel channel reacting to the news by saying, and I am paraphrasing, 'they are going after all our rights next'.
I might agree in an abstract manner it is not a final chapter the same way just imposing red flag laws is not the end goal for gun control activists, but the paragraphs that follow are a little out there.
- dragonwriter 4y ago> That.. seems excessively alarmist. Then you aren't paying attention to the actual legislation being passed in States, the advocacy of leading members of the Republican Party, and even the things explicitly stated in the writings of Supreme Court justices on this case. > It is on par with Sirius XM Channel channel reacting to the news by saying, and I am paraphrasing, ‘they are going after all our rights next’. Thomas literally (to anyone who understands the scope and impact of the Court’s substantive due process jurisprudence) said that in his concurrence.
- A4ET8a8uTh0 4y agoIt is possible. I am not an expert in this area so I do not pay it as close an attention is it may warrant. That said, can you provide any links that would confirm your statements? The little I know is about Kavanaugh and Barrett and neither is an extreme in their writings ( although there are some unflattering bios on the net ). Which SCOTUS member are you referring to? edit re concurrence: I am going through SCOTUS blog(1) and the actual text(2) and I am not seeing the same thing you do. Could you elaborate a little? (1)https://www.scotusblog.com/2022/06/supreme-court-overturns-constitutional-right-to-abortion/ https://www.scotusblog.com/2022/06/supreme-court-overturns-c... (2)https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/19-1392_6j37.pdf https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/19-1392_6j37.pdf