3 ms·
Tech companies respond to U.S. Supreme Court abortion decision
- a2128 4y agohttps://archive.ph/tZaM3 https://archive.ph/tZaM3
- salawat 4y agoHrrrrm. What kind of crime are these abortion laws? I'm wondering if this may qualify as aiding and abetting in jurisdiction shopping, and cases brought as such may actually lead to some interesting jurisprudence. Then again, by definition, I suppose this would be Federal jurisdiction as a contention between States, so a case may not go anywhere? Either way, I'd be wary of leaving paper trail through an employer who is going to hand over transaction records as soon as a judicial subpoena comes through. Pay in cash, ladies. Providers, vary your prices. Anyway, it's unfortunate, but in a way, I think this is a good thing in the sense it may prompt people to undertake legislative action to get bodily sovereignty codified in law. Judges have no business being anything more than a stopgap in what should be a fundamentally recognized right to bodily autonomy.