3 ms·
Blake3 is faster and more secure. I also really don't trust NIST to be honest when they have a history of promoting solutions with backdoors.
by encryptluks2 4y ago
Blake3 is faster and more secure. I also really don't trust NIST to be honest when they have a history of promoting solutions with backdoors.
- oconnor663 4y agoI'm not aware of any reason SHA-3 would be less secure than BLAKE3. Quite the opposite: SHA-3 has a very large security margin, so large that the authors cut the number of rounds in half for KangarooTwelve.