3 ms·
It is always hard to grasp the nuances of the political system in other countries. The prime minister is not the head of the parliament; he is the head of the
by Steer 15y ago
It is always hard to grasp the nuances of the political system in other countries.
The prime minister is not the head of the parliament; he is the head of the government. The head of the parliament is called "talman" (the "speaker" if I would hazard a guess at translating it). You are right in that it is the parliament that make the laws.
What the Swedish prime minister has done is defending the Swedish judicial system which, at least to me, seem like a reasonable thing for him to do. You can read more about it here for example
http://www.swedishwire.com/politics/8437-swedish-pm-slams-julian-assanges-claims- http://www.swedishwire.com/politics/8437-swedish-pm-slams-ju....
I can not find any reputable sources where he is quoted as saying that Assange is guilty.
Regarding the media they have written the same gossip/sensationalistic crap the media of all western countries seem to write in these circumstances, varying wildly between "totally innocent" and "guilty" with a lot of erroneous reporting and misunderstandings in between.
Oh, now I understand what you mean with "secret trials", a better way of putting it is "trials that are closed to the public" which is often done here in Sweden in trials concerning rape or children. That is put in place to protect the victims and although I don't know for sure I can't image that we are the only country in the world to practice it.
All affected parties are of course allowed in to the court room, but you and I ("the public") are not. The verdict is made public as usual.
- illumen 15y agoThis trial happened in a UK court. Not a Swedish one. If the the evidence is not made public in the Swedish trial, then it is a mockery of justice. How can anyone take the word of the court that it was a fair trial? It is not transparent. Saying "Asange is an enemy of the people" is not just defending the Swedish legal system. International law covering human rights applies in Sweden, and those rights will be violated by a secret trial. A country either respects international law and human rights, or it does not. Sweden does not respect this facet of the law, or this human right. In some countries media can be taken to task for declaring someone a rapist without proof. How many of the media has been taken to task in Sweden for doing so? It is strange how the Swedish legal system has been suspiciously quiet in this regard. Count the number of Swedish people sticking up for this Human in this thread. I guess flag sales are up in Sweden, because there does not seem to be many Swedish people arguing that the Swedish state could possibly be wrong here.