4 ms·

> When liberal justices are in charge, they unconstitutionally force their will onto the people. One person having a right to do something is not forcing it on

> When liberal justices are in charge, they unconstitutionally force their will onto the people. One person having a right to do something is not forcing it on anyone else. > place the power back in the hands of the people. A majority of "the people" do not agree with this decision. In fact, they were appointed by someone who did not have majority support, by a party that represents a minority of the actual population. > The problem was activist judges making the Roe decision in the first place. You just got a handful of judges making decisions based on their regligious beliefs. Please explain to me how you see that as different than an original decision?

PathOfEclipse 4y ago
The judges forced their morality on everyone by saying the constitution gave a right to an abortion. The constitution does no such thing, meaning the judges were acting as activists, legislating from the bench, rather than doing their jobs correctly. If you are honest, you should be able to say both that you are pro-abortion and that Roe v. wade was possibly the worst supreme court decision of the 20th century. The secular argument against abortion is so incredibly simple: the unborn child has the right to life just as the mother does. Government is about managing the rights of everyone and balancing them when they come in conflict. And, finally, abortion is forced on our society in the sense that our tax dollars fund it, our tax dollars fund public schools that promote it, and, if the left have their way, insurance companies will be forced to cover it, possibly free of charge: https://noqreport.com/2021/02/09/california-bill-would-force-insurance-companies-to-fund-free-abortions/ https://noqreport.com/2021/02/09/california-bill-would-force...
- ModernMech 4y ago
  You are aware that Roe v. Wade was originally decided by a conservative court, right? > The secular argument against abortion is so incredibly simple: the unborn child has the right to life just as the mother does. Government is about managing the rights of everyone and balancing them when they come in conflict. That’s exactly what Roe managed to do for 50 years. Now there will be about half the country where these competing rights are not balanced, but tilt entirely in the favor of the fetus to the detriment of the woman.

PathOfEclipse 4y ago

The judges forced their morality on everyone by saying the constitution gave a right to an abortion. The constitution does no such thing, meaning the judges were acting as activists, legislating from the bench, rather than doing their jobs correctly. If you are honest, you should be able to say both that you are pro-abortion and that Roe v. wade was possibly the worst supreme court decision of the 20th century. The secular argument against abortion is so incredibly simple: the unborn child has the right to life just as the mother does. Government is about managing the rights of everyone and balancing them when they come in conflict. And, finally, abortion is forced on our society in the sense that our tax dollars fund it, our tax dollars fund public schools that promote it, and, if the left have their way, insurance companies will be forced to cover it, possibly free of charge: https://noqreport.com/2021/02/09/california-bill-would-force-insurance-companies-to-fund-free-abortions/ https://noqreport.com/2021/02/09/california-bill-would-force...

ModernMech 4y ago
You are aware that Roe v. Wade was originally decided by a conservative court, right? > The secular argument against abortion is so incredibly simple: the unborn child has the right to life just as the mother does. Government is about managing the rights of everyone and balancing them when they come in conflict. That’s exactly what Roe managed to do for 50 years. Now there will be about half the country where these competing rights are not balanced, but tilt entirely in the favor of the fetus to the detriment of the woman.