4 ms·

"beautiful" But then it has quirks like using ;; to end statements (EDIT: only in the REPL). And comments with that weird syntax But worse of all are the opti

"beautiful" But then it has quirks like using ;; to end statements (EDIT: only in the REPL). And comments with that weird syntax But worse of all are the optional parenthesis in function calls. Yes, I know Ruby has it. But it feel super weird and a needless flexibility (that causes more confusion than it solves). I can't get over this stuff, sorry.

jon_smark 4y ago
I have to interject here for the sake of those unfamiliar with OCaml and who may take the parent comment at face value. Saying "it has quirks like using ;; to end statements" is misleading to the point of just being bogus. The double semi-colon is only ever used in the REPL. In fact, I've been programming OCaml for fun and professionally for over 15 years, and I've never used a double semi-colon in my code, nor have I ever encountered one in the "wild".
- raverbashing 4y ago
  Thanks for clarifying
toolslive 4y ago
> worst of all are the optional parenthesis in function calls ?? > let r = some_function x y z in ... There are no parentheses here, and it's not optional. What you probably are missing is that if `some_function` takes 3 arguments, then `some_function x y` is a function value that takes 1 parameter (currying). Btw, iirc, SML doesn't have this: there you only have 1 parameter but it could be a tuple
- raverbashing 4y ago
  > Note how OCaml is flexible about whether you write the parentheses or not, and whether you write whitespace or not. from here https://cs3110.github.io/textbook/chapters/basics/toplevel.html#functions https://cs3110.github.io/textbook/chapters/basics/toplevel.h...
  - toolslive 4y ago
    isn't that the case in most programming languages ? In essence, if you have an expression exp then (exp) is also an expression. So nothing special about OCaml in that regard. [note, just checked python, php, and js and it is the case]
    - raverbashing 4y ago
      Ok so maybe the example is confusing, because it seemed it was talking about function calls (where they are mandatory in the languages you mentioned)
- frou_dh 4y ago
  > Btw, iirc, SML doesn't have this: there you only have 1 parameter but it could be a tuple Nah, SML does also support automatically curried function definitions, it's just that by convention that feature didn't get used as often. I tried to find out why that was the case a while ago, and stumbled on this explanation: https://www.reddit.com/r/ProgrammingLanguages/comments/jde9xp/advantages_of_currying_in_a_programming_language/g97szvz/ https://www.reddit.com/r/ProgrammingLanguages/comments/jde9x...

jon_smark 4y ago

I have to interject here for the sake of those unfamiliar with OCaml and who may take the parent comment at face value. Saying "it has quirks like using ;; to end statements" is misleading to the point of just being bogus. The double semi-colon is only ever used in the REPL. In fact, I've been programming OCaml for fun and professionally for over 15 years, and I've never used a double semi-colon in my code, nor have I ever encountered one in the "wild".

raverbashing 4y ago
Thanks for clarifying

toolslive 4y ago

> worst of all are the optional parenthesis in function calls ?? > let r = some_function x y z in ... There are no parentheses here, and it's not optional. What you probably are missing is that if `some_function` takes 3 arguments, then `some_function x y` is a function value that takes 1 parameter (currying). Btw, iirc, SML doesn't have this: there you only have 1 parameter but it could be a tuple

raverbashing 4y ago
> Note how OCaml is flexible about whether you write the parentheses or not, and whether you write whitespace or not. from here https://cs3110.github.io/textbook/chapters/basics/toplevel.html#functions https://cs3110.github.io/textbook/chapters/basics/toplevel.h...
- toolslive 4y ago
  isn't that the case in most programming languages ? In essence, if you have an expression exp then (exp) is also an expression. So nothing special about OCaml in that regard. [note, just checked python, php, and js and it is the case]
  - raverbashing 4y ago
    Ok so maybe the example is confusing, because it seemed it was talking about function calls (where they are mandatory in the languages you mentioned)
frou_dh 4y ago
> Btw, iirc, SML doesn't have this: there you only have 1 parameter but it could be a tuple Nah, SML does also support automatically curried function definitions, it's just that by convention that feature didn't get used as often. I tried to find out why that was the case a while ago, and stumbled on this explanation: https://www.reddit.com/r/ProgrammingLanguages/comments/jde9xp/advantages_of_currying_in_a_programming_language/g97szvz/ https://www.reddit.com/r/ProgrammingLanguages/comments/jde9x...