3 ms·
> it's so easy to dismiss AI as "insentient" without any proof whatsoever as it should be because it's asking to prove a negative. burden of proof for "sent
by zzzeek 4y ago
> it's so easy to dismiss AI as "insentient" without any proof whatsoever
as it should be because it's asking to prove a negative. burden of proof for "sentience" is on those who claim it. as a bonus, "I know a human when I see one" does not count!
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- paskozdilar 4y agoWhat exactly makes "sentience" a positive and "insentience" a negative? We might as well invent a new word - say, "bodise" which means "insentient". Would in that case "bodise" be a positive and "inbodise" a negative?