3 ms·
There is definitely something to this. Basically any man who takes their shirt off in a film is generally ridiculously muscular. As in, a body shape that's only
by zelos 4y ago
There is definitely something to this. Basically any man who takes their shirt off in a film is generally ridiculously muscular. As in, a body shape that's only achievable with hours of intense training a day, probably with an expensive personal trainer, diet plan etc. I remember an interview with Henry Cavill (The Witcher) describing the process of dehydrating himself on days before shirtless scenes to enhance muscle definition.
I know it affects me. Looking at media 20-30 years ago I don't this was as prevalent.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- Johanx64 4y ago>As in, a body shape that's only achievable with hours of intense training a day, probably with an expensive personal trainer, diet plan etc. It's all steroids. Hours of training and some super rigorous diet plan is all a ruse. It's steroids. People have recovery time, hours of intense training a day is physically not possible, atleast not in the way which would build muscle for the type of shitless shots.
- eggsmediumrare 4y agoIt's steroids and hours and hours of training. Steroids aren't magic, you still need to work for it.
- Johanx64 4y agoYou can't have hours and hours of training without the fast recovery effects of roids and various PEDs. Mentioning hard work is completely unnecessary, it is a given. Following the programme and rep-ing till failure isn't necessarily particularly "hard work" especially if you're roided up. The difference between using and not using roids & PEDs is so massive, that all this mentioning of "hard work" is extremely disingenuous.
- Der_Einzige 4y agoPeople don't want to watch movies with ugly people in them if possible. This is why a series like the Witcher has a at least a 50/50 general balance in the enjoy.ent if the TV show even though the player base of the games is a sausage fest...