3 ms·
Agreed. For me, it was the coolest living in the future thing imaginable. My eyes were crap, something that in days gone by might have condemned me to the scrap
by feintruled 4y ago
Agreed. For me, it was the coolest living in the future thing imaginable. My eyes were crap, something that in days gone by might have condemned me to the scrapheap, and it got fixed, by science. With a LASER. Just an incredible barometer of progress.
- JCharante 4y agoA blade cutting my eye sounds terrifying though. Did you go completely under?
- feintruled 4y agoNo, you don't. You get eye drops to anaethetise the eye, that's it. BUT.. it's not as horrible as it sounds. Even this initial cutting of the flap is all done with a automated thing that covers your eye, it's not like some guy sways up to you with a scalpel wobbling in his hand. You don't 'see' anything other than your view being obstructed, you certainly don't feel anything. (There is some discomfort afterwards, but they give you eye drops which work wonders) There is a slight smell of something burning, which is a little disconcerting, I can't lie.
- Vinnl 4y agoI had TransPRK, where the experience really just came down to "a light shines in your eye for 20s, then another 20s in the other eye, and you're done". A day of pain afterwards though, which wasn't great. But zero regrets, even on that day. And you have that with LASIK too, though not with LASEK, IIRC.
- goldenkey 4y agoYou got lucky if you didn't need follow up surgeries. The most common cause of myopia is eyeball length, which laser eye surgery doesn't address. So folks end up getting their cornea shaved and sculpted up, in a barbaric way (lasers wow!?) and then their eyeball length accommodates and they need the surgery yet again. There's only so much cornea that can be cut away.. in fact, often folks end up with chronic dry eye from the surgeries. The cornea is really not meant to be cut up, it's extremely delicate, and scars and ulcerates easily. Here's my full comment: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31834633#31860661 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31834633#31860661
- feintruled 4y agoWell, it's my eyeball and I can do what I like with it. Calling something barbaric is a nonsense to me when it doesn't hurt and is done with informed consent (and it works!) I'm sure there are risks, and you might have some haloing at night or whatever, but I went from -4.75, -5.75 to 20/20 vision! And if I end up slightly long sighted.. small price to pay for 20+ years free of glasses. Lasers wow indeed! Of course people should make informed decisions. I'm sure enough of the operations have been done to get a very informative risk breakdown. And if you are happy with glasses more power to you.
- goldenkey 4y ago-5.75 is pretty awful vision, so I can understand the desire. We likely could have fixed that naturally through changing your habits, getting you more accurate scripts, and 3+ activity-specific scripts. I discuss in my comment, how most folks don't really have genetically bad vision but rather persistent biological compensations that can be ameliorated. But sure, if you were looking for a quick fix that doesn't last, I suppose it's effective and I don't demean you for your choices.
- feintruled 4y agoI'd love to believe it could have been fixed naturally, at the time that branch of treatment all seemed woo-woo, be fascinated to hear if there is any hard evidence for it working now. But anyway, sorry for the previous sharp reply. It wasn't warranted.