3 ms·
> they wouldn't be using it unless it was usable for "real work". We had to introduce Rust at work because we really needed some WASM functionality in one of o
by brabel 4y ago
> they wouldn't be using it unless it was usable for "real work".
We had to introduce Rust at work because we really needed some WASM functionality in one of our mostly JS frontends... anyway, I was excited about Rust and all and pushed the idea, implemented the whole thing and made presentations for other developers about Rust. I was thinking everyone would be as excited as I was and would jump at the chance of maintaining the Rust module.
In reality , only one of the 20+ devs even tried to ever touch the Rust code. Everyone else thought the code looked like Greek (no offence to my greek friends!) ... today when the code needs change, I am pretty much the only one who can do it, or the other guy (who is more novice than me in Rust so takes a lot longer to do anything, but at least there's someone else).
For reference: we write code in Java/Kotlin/Groovy/Erlang. So, we're not a system programming shop in any way, so I can't speak for places where C and C++ were previously being used.
- Klonoar 4y agoI would be curious how your shop fares with Swift then, considering it may also look "like greek" to them. (Legit point, no snark)
- brabel 4y agoEveryone seems alright with Kotlin, and Swift seems close enough to Kotlin that I think they would do fine (we do have a few frontend devs that do Swift BTW).