2 ms·
Either way as the court decided today it applies to all "bearable arms", I guess you can't really bear a hellfire missile, M1-Abrams Tank or an atomic bomb, but
by willcipriano 4y ago
Either way as the court decided today it applies to all "bearable arms", I guess you can't really bear a hellfire missile, M1-Abrams Tank or an atomic bomb, but I don't see how fully automatic weapons aren't bearable. Viral\chemical weapons seem super bearable, but I bet they would call them something tricky like munitions instead.
Really the law doesn't have much internal consistency. People like to say it's complicated, but I think it's just broken.
- ceejayoz 4y agoIf you can lift 60 pounds, you can bear atomic weaponry. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_Atomic_Demolition_Munition https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_Atomic_Demolition_Muni... You're right; rather than fix the issues technological progress has made for the Constitution, we've chosen to wimp out and make a bewildering, inconsistent set of "yes, buuuuuut..." legal decisions.