> In a technical sense This is a common mistake software engineers make when parsing law. It is not code and cannot be treated in a technical sense as the lang

> In a technical sense This is a common mistake software engineers make when parsing law. It is not code and cannot be treated in a technical sense as the language it was written in was English which is not technical. Imagine every person reading the law is like their own personal compiler and so when they intercept “the law” they get different results. Our Supreme Court exists entirely to determine the standard interpretation of the law whenever a disagreement occurs