3 ms·
The comma is employed in bash and other shell for brace expansion.[1] I can't see how this would conflict with OP's master plan, but I have fundamental objectio
by Maursault 4y ago
The comma is employed in bash and other shell for brace expansion.[1] I can't see how this would conflict with OP's master plan, but I have fundamental objections towards the depths of OP's laziness. Lazy is ok, but there should not be competition to see who can be laziest. At some point, things just won't compress any further, and the attempt at further streamlining efficiency beyond what is useful has a negative effect on efficiency overall. Besides, tab completion is fine as it is and doesn't need what passes for a hack these days. To be clear, contrary to what OP has claimed about not being creative enough to come up with original script names that won't conflict with the flood of new Linux commands every update (wot? LOL), this is only about the OP not being satisfied with tab completion.
[1] https://superuser.com/a/184493 https://superuser.com/a/184493
- SrslyJosh 4y agoThat's a lot of words to say "I don't like this" and insult folks who put time and effort into customizations that improve their own computing experience.
- Maursault 4y ago> who put time and effort into customizations I believe you have made my point quite well once it's understood you are here referring to none other than prefixing script names with a comma. Any words wasted on anything other than the subject is a waste of words, in your comment's case, both ad hominem and straw man fallacies.