4 ms·

Google: 118M results. Top link is the best resource on verified election fraud cases. Yandex: 9M results. The top two links are pretty suspect. Top link promot

Google: 118M results. Top link is the best resource on verified election fraud cases. Yandex: 9M results. The top two links are pretty suspect. Top link promotes Dinesh D'Souza's 2000 Mules documentary in the banner which at best is a one-sided take on election fraud. At worst, very misleading. https://i.imgur.com/n5a9LOd.png https://i.imgur.com/n5a9LOd.png

stainablesteel 4y ago
This is a weird comment because yes, that's exactly what the above person was saying. It shows results that google won't give you. Secondly, I've yet to see any criticisms of 2000 mules data that aren't addressed by the stringency in the analysis they claim to have done. I thought the information they presented was extremely valuable. Are we going to overturn an election at this point? No. But the vulnerabilities to the mail-in ballots were obvious, then lied about, then ignored, then clearly taken advantage of. I want to live in a democracy because voting matters. I especially don't want NPO's destroying this by taking advantage of flawed voting infrastructure. If there are legitimate criticisms of the methods, the data, or anything else coming out of this film I expect a legitimate presentation that can break it down using the actual data in question. All I've seen so far is shilling and gas-lighting.
- 1024core 4y ago
  > then clearly taken advantage of. If you have any evidence, any evidence at all, of significant mail-in ballots fraud, then you should write it up and publish it; and even present it to the USDOJ, because you would have succeeded where Trump's highly-paid teams of lawyers failed. If you don't have proof, then please STFU.
  - jokethrowaway 4y ago
    It's not about whether it happened or not, it's whether it's reported or not. I personally believe (with obviously no proof) there was definitely fraud going on, on both sides. With such an archaic system and such a great economic and power incentive, you would be stupid not to do it. For sure mail in ballots made it even easier than in the past. I've heard about Russian hacking the elections after Trump won for a good 2 years.
jokethrowaway 4y ago
Precisely the point. I didn't even hear about 2000 Mules until I heard some right wing commentator talk about it months after it was released. Instead I'm shoved the latest Greta Thunberg song (You can shove your climate crisis up you **) 5 milliseconds after she sung it. As an avid newspaper and news reader, the media bias shifted tremendously in the last 30 years.
- biaachmonkie 4y ago
  Why should 2000 Mules be promoted in results at all? It's total BS, it's progenitor is a criminal that's was guilty of Election Campaign Finance Fraud. https://www.fbi.gov/contact-us/field-offices/newyork/news/press-releases/dinesh-dsouza-sentenced-in-manhattan-federal-court-to-five-years-of-probation-for-campaign-finance-fraud https://www.fbi.gov/contact-us/field-offices/newyork/news/pr... Or maybe that means Dinesh D’Souza is really the most qualified on election fraud since he has done it himself??? GTFO!

stainablesteel 4y ago

This is a weird comment because yes, that's exactly what the above person was saying. It shows results that google won't give you. Secondly, I've yet to see any criticisms of 2000 mules data that aren't addressed by the stringency in the analysis they claim to have done. I thought the information they presented was extremely valuable. Are we going to overturn an election at this point? No. But the vulnerabilities to the mail-in ballots were obvious, then lied about, then ignored, then clearly taken advantage of. I want to live in a democracy because voting matters. I especially don't want NPO's destroying this by taking advantage of flawed voting infrastructure. If there are legitimate criticisms of the methods, the data, or anything else coming out of this film I expect a legitimate presentation that can break it down using the actual data in question. All I've seen so far is shilling and gas-lighting.

1024core 4y ago
> then clearly taken advantage of. If you have any evidence, any evidence at all, of significant mail-in ballots fraud, then you should write it up and publish it; and even present it to the USDOJ, because you would have succeeded where Trump's highly-paid teams of lawyers failed. If you don't have proof, then please STFU.
- jokethrowaway 4y ago
  It's not about whether it happened or not, it's whether it's reported or not. I personally believe (with obviously no proof) there was definitely fraud going on, on both sides. With such an archaic system and such a great economic and power incentive, you would be stupid not to do it. For sure mail in ballots made it even easier than in the past. I've heard about Russian hacking the elections after Trump won for a good 2 years.

jokethrowaway 4y ago

Precisely the point. I didn't even hear about 2000 Mules until I heard some right wing commentator talk about it months after it was released. Instead I'm shoved the latest Greta Thunberg song (You can shove your climate crisis up you **) 5 milliseconds after she sung it. As an avid newspaper and news reader, the media bias shifted tremendously in the last 30 years.

biaachmonkie 4y ago
Why should 2000 Mules be promoted in results at all? It's total BS, it's progenitor is a criminal that's was guilty of Election Campaign Finance Fraud. https://www.fbi.gov/contact-us/field-offices/newyork/news/press-releases/dinesh-dsouza-sentenced-in-manhattan-federal-court-to-five-years-of-probation-for-campaign-finance-fraud https://www.fbi.gov/contact-us/field-offices/newyork/news/pr... Or maybe that means Dinesh D’Souza is really the most qualified on election fraud since he has done it himself??? GTFO!