4 ms·
Not sure where yours is coming from, if we look at [20] it makes no such claim. https://web.archive.org/web/20061105100939/http://www.informationweek.com/autho
by bastardoperator 4y ago
Not sure where yours is coming from, if we look at [20] it makes no such claim.
https://web.archive.org/web/20061105100939/http://www.informationweek.com/author/internet36.htm https://web.archive.org/web/20061105100939/http://www.inform...
- birdyrooster 4y agohttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Santa_Cruz_Operation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Santa_Cruz_Operation They were a partner with Microsoft maintaining a version of Xenix
- bastardoperator 4y agoThat doesn't imply ownership and the article [20] that you pointed out doesn't make a specific claim. All good, but MSFT never fully owned or operated SCO at any level is the point I'm trying to make.
- birdyrooster 4y agoYou aren't really saying anything at all. SCO would never have existed without Microsoft and Microsoft had a very significant stake in their business and gave it direction.