4 ms·
your comment is just so vacuous and low-effort all this ruling stipulates is that jurisdictions are barred from employing arbitrary standards as a means of gat
by newaccount2021 4y ago
your comment is just so vacuous and low-effort
all this ruling stipulates is that jurisdictions are barred from employing arbitrary standards as a means of gatekeeping access to a Constitutional Right (like it or not, that has already been established in Heller)
so in California, it won't be fair game for the Sheriff to ask for campaign contributions in exchange for a favorable CCW consideration...and in NY you won't have to exploit political connections for merit of the same
- suture 4y agoThat is not all the ruling implies or will lead too. You are badly distorting the impact this ruling will have.
- IceMetalPunk 4y agoHeller intentionally made no mention of public carrying of weapons, only private carrying on private property. It also stated that the right to bear arms is not unlimited and that guns and gun ownership would continue to be regulated. So, no, Heller did not establish a Constitutional right to carry weapons in public.