3 ms·

This. To space folks, that is plummeting. It's enough of a difference, and a surprise, to have a significant effect on business models.

• Aachen 4y ago
  It's a significant difference that has a real impact on the satellites. But we also don't say that airplanes plummet when landing or elevators when going down. To me at least, plummet signals it's a matter of seconds or, perhaps from great altitude, minutes until it hits the bottom. So to me, and that's knowing a thing or two about space, this title is just clickbait and not a good description of the phenomenon observed even for a techy public like HN.
  • dylan604 4y ago
    We absolutely refer to planes as plummeting, when the situation warrants. This article wasn't written for HN. It was written for the general audience that peruses Space.com. Because someone found it interesting and posted to HN is pretty much the only reason it is on HN. Space.com didn't submit it in hopes of gaining attention by a hypercritical audience. Yes, I agree it is click bait. I'm just playing devil's advocate to some of your weaker arguments.
    • thaumasiotes 4y ago
      > We absolutely refer to planes as plummeting, when the situation warrants. Yes, and landing is not one of those situations. To describe a plane as "plummeting" requires that it crash (or recover and stay airborne) rather than landing. Or in other words, Aachen's claim that "we also don't say that airplanes plummet when landing" was correct in every particular.
  • deleted 4y ago
    [deleted]