3 ms·
>> "European battlefields may have provided a convenient source of bone that could be ground down into bone-meal, an effective form of fertiliser. One of the ma
by sandworm101 4y ago
>> "European battlefields may have provided a convenient source of bone that could be ground down into bone-meal, an effective form of fertiliser. One of the main markets for this raw material was the British Isles.”
So quickly we forget. By weight, most of those bones would have been animal bones. Horses and mules were everywhere around armies until the middle of the 20th century. And, pre-refrigeration, armies did not move food around in boxes. It walked behind the army on hooves. The combination of dead horses/mules in combat, plus all the cattle being eaten, means that the vast majority of bones around a battle would not have been be human.
- gumby 4y ago> And, pre-refrigeration, armies did not move food around in boxes. Don't forget that canning was invented in response to a prize issued by the Napoleonic army. However it doesn't look like it was ready for use by the time of the battle at Waterloo.
- mc32 4y agoGenghis Khan the great ruthless conqueror of worlds would take herds (cattle and horses/meat and milk) along with his armies in order to feed the soldiers --lucky for him, the steppes were unusually green during his campaigns.