The US supreme court already believes it's dubious that an AI can create an original work: https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.natlawreview.com/article/paradise-lo

The US supreme court already believes it's dubious that an AI can create an original work: https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.natlawreview.com/article/paradise-lost-art-created-ai-ineligible-copyright-protection%3famp https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.natlawreview.com/article/pa... Though has ruled that training AI on copyright materials is fine, as long as the defendants can claim it's a card catalog: https://towardsdatascience.com/the-most-important-supreme-court-decision-for-data-science-and-machine-learning-44cfc1c1bcaf https://towardsdatascience.com/the-most-important-supreme-co... So it's going to be interesting to see how this is viewed by the supreme court when it gets there.