> I'm curious what a 69% increase looks like in real numbers - a 20% increase on next to nothing is still next to nothing. It's a good question. User Cenk jus

> I'm curious what a 69% increase looks like in real numbers - a 20% increase on next to nothing is still next to nothing. It's a good question. User Cenk just provided a link to the full paper in another comment: https://oa.mg/pdf/10.1016-j.trip.2022.100604.pdf https://oa.mg/pdf/10.1016-j.trip.2022.100604.pdf If my skimming is accurate, the answer seems to be that they surveyed two hours of afternoon commute in September in 39 locations, and saw an average increase from 138 cyclists to 211. So likely a real increase rather than a statistical artifact, but also quite small in terms of absolute numbers given the costs involved.