>> same concept Completely different concept. That's personal preference vs. a potential health hazard. Great example - masks. You may have had a personal pr

>> same concept Completely different concept. That's personal preference vs. a potential health hazard. Great example - masks. You may have had a personal preference not to wear a mask during the height of the pandemic, but that 'personal preference' puts others at a proven health hazard. In this case, your 'personal preference' is irrelevant. If second hand outdoor smoke really did have the affects you initially used to back up your point, then that would be a 'health hazard', and therefore important to the greater whole, and something to be considered taking legal action on. Since you reduced your argument to 'I don't want to smell it', the underlying concept completely changes, and your statement is completely irrelevant.