3 ms·
"Whitepaper", for a long time, meant sort of the opposite of "academic paper." They weren't published in refereed conferences and journals and were usually publ
by UncleMeat 4y ago
"Whitepaper", for a long time, meant sort of the opposite of "academic paper." They weren't published in refereed conferences and journals and were usually published by corporations or governments but they resembled academic work in their contributions.
Something like the original BTC paper is a good example. It wasn't published in a conference or journal, but the level of rigor and the scale of the contribution is similar to what would be published in a conference or journal.
I think the crypto community was the end of it. Now "we are launching $CoolCoin" gets called "whitepaper."
- ghoward 4y agoThat makes sense. Thank you for teaching me that. I would still call my paper a whitepaper, though. While it's not rigorous, it's more about law where rigor doesn't apply in the same way. And it is not peer-reviewed, although it was reviewed and rejected by the FSF.