3 ms·
I think you might be missing the point of their frustration. Lots of companies do not put their code in public repositories, granted I understand the perspecti
by wowokay 4y ago
I think you might be missing the point of their frustration.
Lots of companies do not put their code in public repositories, granted I understand the perspective of violating a license, but the point is if you don’t want your code used by someone else (even with the risk of not getting credit, don’t know why that matters) then don’t make your repo public period.
To that point, what’s to stop GitHub from making a policy that states: “All public repositories will be utilized in AI training”?
- ryukafalz 4y ago> even with the risk of not getting credit, don’t know why that matters The point is that it’s not respecting the license, not just that it’s not giving “credit”. If I release code under a GPL license, I damn well don’t want someone using that code under a license that’s not GPL-compatible, no matter how it got there.