4 ms·

Then they have some explaining to do. As they are very wrong, from a historical/archaeological point view [1]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the

• brailsafe 4y ago
  > Then they have some explaining to do. As they are very wrong, from a historical point view [1] Kind of explains the general vibe of relations between everyone in that area historically
• VictorPath 4y ago
  The relevant Wikipedia page is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khazars https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khazars
  • yonixw 4y ago
    Did you read it? It literally has a "Use in antisemitic" section. Can you have any bigger red flag? > Use in antisemitic polemic > conspiracy theorist, David Icke, who states that the Israelians falsely claim to be descendants of the Biblical Jews I don't really care about conspiracy theorists. Mainly because they ignore 2000 years of accepted archeology.
    • nashashmi 4y ago
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Thirteenth_Tribe#Genetic_research https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Thirteenth_Tribe#Genetic_r... This led me to look up similar information. Another article [1] looks into this a little more deeply. I feel there is a resurgence of despising European dominance over the last 200 years and Israel is just another point here. Thus, we have material hypothesizing the illegitimacy of European Jews when the Jews of other ethnicities may have better acceptance in the region. (But all of this is just a vague hypothesis.) [1] https://www.science.org/content/article/tracing-roots-jewishness-rev2 https://www.science.org/content/article/tracing-roots-jewish...