> This type of argument always distracts from the fact that figuring out where we draw the line between theft and reimagining. This seems to be missing a word,

> This type of argument always distracts from the fact that figuring out where we draw the line between theft and reimagining. This seems to be missing a word, could you clarify? Also: since you mentioned theft: this actually comes down to the discussion whether you can own thought and/or digital artifacts which can be replicated without taking anything away from the "owner". Given the absolute choice I'd rather pick complete freedom than restriction. I suspect that anyone's opinion on this follows what they value higher: creation or exploitation.