3 ms·
The first can be automated without ML though. And once you use ML you cannot guarantee it won't copy-paste existing code. This whole thing would be fine if Git
by alpaca128 4y ago
The first can be automated without ML though. And once you use ML you cannot guarantee it won't copy-paste existing code.
This whole thing would be fine if GitHub hadn't just used all public code on their platform, ignoring all involved licenses.
- rob74 4y agoThe problem is, if they had used only code with a license that allows copying without attribution, there wouldn't have been a lot of code left...
- alpaca128 4y agoDifficulty doing something legally doesn't justify breaking the law.
- xupybd 4y agoIt changes the code for use. I'm not sure it can be considered a copy. It much like reading someone else's code and drawing ideas and patterns from that code.