3 ms·
I would like also a comparison with the String deduplication option ( XX:+UseStringDeduplication ). From what I understand it doesn't use String.intern but mak
by mrighele 4y ago
I would like also a comparison with the String deduplication option ( XX:+UseStringDeduplication ).
From what I understand it doesn't use String.intern but makes different instances share the same underlying char array so I am wondering how it behaves.
In my tests it gives nice memory savings "for free", but I never had the chance to test with a production workload