3 ms·
The problem with code vs no-code is that the only barrier it removes is the code. The “code” is the easy part. Coding is like writing a story in a way and ima
by cassac 4y ago
The problem with code vs no-code is that the only barrier it removes is the code. The “code” is the easy part.
Coding is like writing a story in a way and imagining the story is what’s hard. Whether it’s written in code, pictures, graphs, or grunts is irrelevant. No-code will not make a good story teller. Sure you will lower the barrier for those with little imagination telling small tales, but it will not help in the epic adventures.
- f0c1s 4y ago> The “code” is the easy part. This is an understatement. Main problems are versioning, collaborating, maintenance. Coding is like writing a story with other authors, with each chapter inspired by /writing-prompt, and publishing the whole book with new ISBN for every typo. If app-publishing is fast, {no|low}-code wins. The obvious caveat being, that it is not a full fledged system where you can build yet another no-code platform on top of it.