3 ms·
When your corporate intent is not to fire VPs who go "off the reservation", but continue to employ, reward them with bonuses, there's a plausible argument that
by FireBeyond 4y ago
When your corporate intent is not to fire VPs who go "off the reservation", but continue to employ, reward them with bonuses, there's a plausible argument that you're absolutely defining that as your corporate intent.
- ethbr0 4y agoPer parent's description, there was no reservation. It was just everyone doing their own thing. And having worked at a few companies that suddenly fell into orders-of-magnitude more revenue, it rings plausible. When the money hose is spewing, nobody spends much time asking "Why?" anyone is doing anything, as long as it's just shy (or sometime inclusive) of embezzlement.