4 ms·
Exactly, that statement would only be valid if e-cigarette had zero net impact in smoking adoption. The reality is that Juul made smoking "cool" again, just as
by ehsankia 4y ago
Exactly, that statement would only be valid if e-cigarette had zero net impact in smoking adoption. The reality is that Juul made smoking "cool" again, just as it was going out of style. You can look at any graph of tobacco use, it was starting to go downwards and then shot up again.
- HWR_14 4y ago> that statement would only be valid if e-cigarette had zero net impact in smoking adoption As a minor point, it could still apply with a slight overall increase of use. The required scale is far closer to zero than what it actually was, but of how many new people vaping would you accept if it suddenly caused all smokers to never smoke. It's an interesting question of which is the best for public health.