2 ms·
All you needed from that reference was that it was another stablecoin and platform that was on solid grounding and didn’t collapse, which was implicit from the
by SilasX 4y ago
All you needed from that reference was that it was another stablecoin and platform that was on solid grounding and didn’t collapse, which was implicit from the original context. It wasn’t a huge leap or research burden.
- HWR_14 4y agoIt was claimed that it obviously didn't have the same structural issues as Terra/Luna. That is in no way > All you needed from that reference was that it was another stablecoin and platform that was on solid grounding and didn’t collapse,
- SilasX 4y agoDon’t lose sight of the main point: arcticbull was claiming he “told you so”. He obviously didn’t. If you’re ready to accept that there’s a big difference between the two cryptocurrencies that needs research to understand, then you accept that he had no good faith basis to claim to “have told you so” in his comment history, because he didn’t do the research either.