> you don't understand how vaccines work and are antivax, full stop. To quote the GGP: People get applied unrepresentative negative labels because they ask que

> you don't understand how vaccines work and are antivax, full stop. To quote the GGP: People get applied unrepresentative negative labels because they ask questions, challenge points, have different opinions or simply take principled stances. Your comment: Q.E.D. > Their individual effects are far less potent without the herd effects. Herd immunization was estimated to be reached with 60-70% of vaccination. I'd be totally in favor of as much campaigning as possible to get to those levels. I was rushing to get the vaccines whenever I could just to contribute to this number. At the same time, I don't think it is morally justified to force anyone to inject a substance in their bodies. Even if the number was higher, I was still encouraging people to get the vaccine. Even when it was clear that vaccine was not that effective to stop infection or reduce spread, I would still tell people "at least it can help you to build up your own immunity". But I would never defend the idea people should be forced or compelled to get the vaccine.