2 ms·
> I'm not saying TARs, TANs or TCNs are FUD and you can ignore them > Apple and Google are free to eliminate it, if they so choose. Pick one. Again, a TCN co
by alfiedotwtf 4y ago
> I'm not saying TARs, TANs or TCNs are FUD and you can ignore them
> Apple and Google are free to eliminate it, if they so choose.
Pick one.
Again, a TCN compels a provider to develop a targeted capability, or face jail time.
- Youden 4y agoA TCN can only compel a targeted capability where doing so does not require introduction of a systemic weakness. If the system is secured in such a way that the targeted capability isn't possible (e.g. open-source project with e2e encryption and verifiable builds), the government cannot compel introduction of a systemic weakness (e.g. stop using verifiable builds) to make it possible. My suggestion is that Apple/Google build their software such that it is systemically secure against targeted attacks.