3 ms·
> because the model doesn't produce outputs which align with the researchers' Western, liberal viewpoint. What evidence do you have for claiming this motivatio
by ghostly_s 4y ago
> because the model doesn't produce outputs which align with the researchers' Western, liberal viewpoint.
What evidence do you have for claiming this motivation?
- jazzyjackson 4y agoRTFA, after discussing the various biases at work in the training set: > For these reasons, we have decided not to release our Parti models, code, or data for public use without further safeguards in place. The problem is the results align too much with a western liberal viewpoint, which is anti-thetical to the western liberal viewpoint. They would prefer an AI which has a culturally diverse output.
- ghostly_s 4y agowhat on earth are you talking about
- alphabetting 4y agoI believe he's trying to say something similar to the "one sided political view" section here: https://gist.github.com/yoavg/9fc9be2f98b47c189a513573d902fb27 https://gist.github.com/yoavg/9fc9be2f98b47c189a513573d902fb... I believe it's more complex than that but it's undeniable there is a cadre of Twitter AI activists who would pick models like this apart if released and use the worst anecdotal examples to generate a ton of bad press over "racist AI" which is why you don't see these made public.