4 ms·
What if existing literature and study is somewhat biased by 'green' funding?
by blangk 4y ago
What if existing literature and study is somewhat biased by 'green' funding?
- outside1234 4y ago
- option_key 4y ago>and if necessary, turn off Fox News Quips like this aren't very productive if you want to convince others of your viewpoint.
- blueblob 4y agoThat would be a testable hypothesis that you have not tested. Anybody can do whataboutism but it isn't a meaningful argument. If it's your belief that the literature is biased by 'green' funding, prove it.
- adamrezich 4y agohow would this be done, without being dismissed as being "just a bunch of plots with no effort to engage with the existing literature and study"?
- sharkjacobs 4y agoEngaging with the existing literature would be a good start. If you were interested in studying the relationship between bias and funding you might do a survey of published papers and articles on the subject. If you can identify some measurable criteria that can be used to rate how "green" a paper's funding is then you can use that as an axis and compare the surveyed papers to reveal trends.
- butterNaN 4y agoAdditionally, since one is already doing that, check out what kind of funding Fossil Fuel companies have done in the past and present.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]