3 ms·
I like the idea in theory, but basically all systems currently in use, are good enough to run "pseudosimplicity" programs without trouble. We don't need to mak
by eternityforest 4y ago
I like the idea in theory, but basically all systems currently in use, are good enough to run "pseudosimplicity" programs without trouble.
We don't need to make stuff all that lightweight, Moore's law seems to have won. We just need to not invent a new way to make things horribly slow or otherwise bad, like, by not making stuff cloud first or have a mandatory blockchain feature.
Of course, a movement can be about more than one thing at once, and if the permacomputing community values through and through simplicity for it's own sake, I can't argue with that.