> Uhhh, do you just mean things that you specifically care about? Because I consider DNS-over-HTTPS, site isolation, multi-account containers, scipt-blocking, e

> Uhhh, do you just mean things that you specifically care about? Because I consider DNS-over-HTTPS, site isolation, multi-account containers, scipt-blocking, etc. all to be features that were beneficial to users. I mean implementing ALL useful technologies, the ones you mentioned, the ones I mentioned, not just the ones that don't threaten the moat. There seems to be a pattern in the mainstream browsers to ignore the P2P tech for reasons ;) > I personally don't want Tor, Webtorrent, ENS, or IPFS to be in my browser, nor other cryptocurrency stuff to be near my browser. This is not as much of a selling point as you make it out to be, at least for some users. That's fine! But there are very valid use-cases for streaming torrents, for accessing onion sites, for ENS domain lookups, and accessing IPFS content. Just because you personally don't want or need them doesn't mean others don't. I'm glad Brave gives the option and ability to easily access these technologies. > I'm not really for or against Brave, but you're presenting your argument as if it is fact; everything you said is entirely opinion. I mainly annotated browser monetization & adblocking policies and listed tech in Brave not in other browsers. Please be specific on your criticism and I will address it.