3 ms·

He was hinting that GP should apply that same standard to other browsers and see how many are left. Brave is up front about how it's monetized. Browsers like F

He was hinting that GP should apply that same standard to other browsers and see how many are left. Brave is up front about how it's monetized. Browsers like FireFox that get their revenue from Google Search referrals, not so much. Only one browser recently has been serious about implementing protocols and features that are beneficial to the user, not companies. So while Chrome mulls blocking adblockers, Brave has one built in. How many other browsers have Tor, Webtorrent, ENS, IPFS support?

ziddoap 4y ago
>Only one browser recently has been serious about implementing protocols and features that are beneficial to the user, not companies. Uhhh, do you just mean things that you specifically care about? Because I consider DNS-over-HTTPS, site isolation, multi-account containers, scipt-blocking, etc. all to be features that were beneficial to users. >How many other browsers have Tor, Webtorrent, ENS, IPFS support? I personally don't want Tor, Webtorrent, ENS, or IPFS to be in my browser, nor other cryptocurrency stuff to be near my browser. This is not as much of a selling point as you make it out to be, at least for some users. I'm not really for or against Brave, but you're presenting your argument as if it is fact; everything you said is entirely opinion.
- hunterb123 4y ago
  > Uhhh, do you just mean things that you specifically care about? Because I consider DNS-over-HTTPS, site isolation, multi-account containers, scipt-blocking, etc. all to be features that were beneficial to users. I mean implementing ALL useful technologies, the ones you mentioned, the ones I mentioned, not just the ones that don't threaten the moat. There seems to be a pattern in the mainstream browsers to ignore the P2P tech for reasons ;) > I personally don't want Tor, Webtorrent, ENS, or IPFS to be in my browser, nor other cryptocurrency stuff to be near my browser. This is not as much of a selling point as you make it out to be, at least for some users. That's fine! But there are very valid use-cases for streaming torrents, for accessing onion sites, for ENS domain lookups, and accessing IPFS content. Just because you personally don't want or need them doesn't mean others don't. I'm glad Brave gives the option and ability to easily access these technologies. > I'm not really for or against Brave, but you're presenting your argument as if it is fact; everything you said is entirely opinion. I mainly annotated browser monetization & adblocking policies and listed tech in Brave not in other browsers. Please be specific on your criticism and I will address it.

ziddoap 4y ago

>Only one browser recently has been serious about implementing protocols and features that are beneficial to the user, not companies. Uhhh, do you just mean things that you specifically care about? Because I consider DNS-over-HTTPS, site isolation, multi-account containers, scipt-blocking, etc. all to be features that were beneficial to users. >How many other browsers have Tor, Webtorrent, ENS, IPFS support? I personally don't want Tor, Webtorrent, ENS, or IPFS to be in my browser, nor other cryptocurrency stuff to be near my browser. This is not as much of a selling point as you make it out to be, at least for some users. I'm not really for or against Brave, but you're presenting your argument as if it is fact; everything you said is entirely opinion.

hunterb123 4y ago
> Uhhh, do you just mean things that you specifically care about? Because I consider DNS-over-HTTPS, site isolation, multi-account containers, scipt-blocking, etc. all to be features that were beneficial to users. I mean implementing ALL useful technologies, the ones you mentioned, the ones I mentioned, not just the ones that don't threaten the moat. There seems to be a pattern in the mainstream browsers to ignore the P2P tech for reasons ;) > I personally don't want Tor, Webtorrent, ENS, or IPFS to be in my browser, nor other cryptocurrency stuff to be near my browser. This is not as much of a selling point as you make it out to be, at least for some users. That's fine! But there are very valid use-cases for streaming torrents, for accessing onion sites, for ENS domain lookups, and accessing IPFS content. Just because you personally don't want or need them doesn't mean others don't. I'm glad Brave gives the option and ability to easily access these technologies. > I'm not really for or against Brave, but you're presenting your argument as if it is fact; everything you said is entirely opinion. I mainly annotated browser monetization & adblocking policies and listed tech in Brave not in other browsers. Please be specific on your criticism and I will address it.