4 ms·

technically useful if the first step is to remove SEO bias today then apply goggles.. next is transparency for the goggle filter actions (nothing more sinister

technically useful if the first step is to remove SEO bias today then apply goggles.. next is transparency for the goggle filter actions (nothing more sinister than a convincing lie) overall looks useful

2Gkashmiri 4y ago
my mind boggles at the sheer number of people being employed over SEO so removing that bias is like literally killing their livelihood. i don't care anyways because i don't use google and use a pi-hole AND ublock origin so i am insulated from ads but just saying
melq 4y ago
How would you 'remove' SEO bias?
- vkou 4y ago
  You apply an arbitrary filter that deranks 'shitty' sites, and then you play a semantic game about what 'bias' is, and how you don't have it, but all the competing search engines do. There's no objective measure of what site is 'good', and what site has been 'SEO-gamed' to rise to the top of <arbitrary search engine's algorithm>. The measures are subjective, and people complain when changes to the algorithm aimed at punishing black-hat-SEO also punish their website (Rightly or wrongly). Not to mention the problem of using black-hat-SEO to punish a competitor (By creating scummy links to them, that make it look like they are trying to game the search engine.)
  - hedora 4y ago
    Growing up, my mother always used to give me books that contained content on page one. This goggle really brings back memories of wandering the dusty library isles of Mediterranean street markets with their pungent spices and beautifully crafted rugs. ... 100,000 words later ... I don't think it will be very hard get right.
- mistrial9 4y ago
  I personally ? would remove SEO-bias by first exposing the actual construction of the site without SEO add-ons, to some engine for consideration. A simple example would be "built with wordpress". Please note that it is wise to know that I do not know, many many things. So it becomes a networked endeavor, to find and identify "literal attributes" to sites for the use of the engine, not my personal opinion of what the web-o-sphere is in 2022. A very very significant example is the primary language group exposed on the site.. for example, Cantonese ? I personally support the rights of "minority" languages like Gaelic and Welsh in the European setting, Tamil for South Asia, things like that.. make it so..
  - ryandrake 4y ago
    I agree, the ability to reliably filter out overly-SEO sites, copy-spam, and other search engine-bait would be a true game changer! Defining and detecting it is of course the hard part.
  - melq 4y ago
    My point is that as long as there is an algorithm, it will be possible to optimize for it.
    - qu4z-2 4y ago
      The advantage that Brave and co have is that SEO sites will largely not be willing to make changes that decrease their Google rank to improve their Brave rank. If Google changes their algorithm, everyone will optimise for the new one, but as long as the Google algorithm is there and the main priority, Brave may be able to extract some useful signal.
indymike 4y ago
All web search engines are biased to sites that are well designed to be included in the index. It is literally how a search engine works. Removing SEO bias would just eliminate sites that are easy to spider, parse and index and rank. Goggles are great because they will eventually become a signal for Brave to change the rank of a site - or even in the case of sites that end up on lots of goggles, delist them. I love the feature.

2Gkashmiri 4y ago

my mind boggles at the sheer number of people being employed over SEO so removing that bias is like literally killing their livelihood. i don't care anyways because i don't use google and use a pi-hole AND ublock origin so i am insulated from ads but just saying

melq 4y ago

How would you 'remove' SEO bias?

vkou 4y ago
You apply an arbitrary filter that deranks 'shitty' sites, and then you play a semantic game about what 'bias' is, and how you don't have it, but all the competing search engines do. There's no objective measure of what site is 'good', and what site has been 'SEO-gamed' to rise to the top of <arbitrary search engine's algorithm>. The measures are subjective, and people complain when changes to the algorithm aimed at punishing black-hat-SEO also punish their website (Rightly or wrongly). Not to mention the problem of using black-hat-SEO to punish a competitor (By creating scummy links to them, that make it look like they are trying to game the search engine.)
- hedora 4y ago
  Growing up, my mother always used to give me books that contained content on page one. This goggle really brings back memories of wandering the dusty library isles of Mediterranean street markets with their pungent spices and beautifully crafted rugs. ... 100,000 words later ... I don't think it will be very hard get right.
mistrial9 4y ago
I personally ? would remove SEO-bias by first exposing the actual construction of the site without SEO add-ons, to some engine for consideration. A simple example would be "built with wordpress". Please note that it is wise to know that I do not know, many many things. So it becomes a networked endeavor, to find and identify "literal attributes" to sites for the use of the engine, not my personal opinion of what the web-o-sphere is in 2022. A very very significant example is the primary language group exposed on the site.. for example, Cantonese ? I personally support the rights of "minority" languages like Gaelic and Welsh in the European setting, Tamil for South Asia, things like that.. make it so..
- ryandrake 4y ago
  I agree, the ability to reliably filter out overly-SEO sites, copy-spam, and other search engine-bait would be a true game changer! Defining and detecting it is of course the hard part.
- melq 4y ago
  My point is that as long as there is an algorithm, it will be possible to optimize for it.
  - qu4z-2 4y ago
    The advantage that Brave and co have is that SEO sites will largely not be willing to make changes that decrease their Google rank to improve their Brave rank. If Google changes their algorithm, everyone will optimise for the new one, but as long as the Google algorithm is there and the main priority, Brave may be able to extract some useful signal.

indymike 4y ago

All web search engines are biased to sites that are well designed to be included in the index. It is literally how a search engine works. Removing SEO bias would just eliminate sites that are easy to spider, parse and index and rank. Goggles are great because they will eventually become a signal for Brave to change the rank of a site - or even in the case of sites that end up on lots of goggles, delist them. I love the feature.