4 ms·
So what‘s your argument here? 160 search queries per second is very impressive. These aren‘t request to a stupid api, but users actually using a tool.
by dna_polymerase 4y ago
So what‘s your argument here? 160 search queries per second is very impressive. These aren‘t request to a stupid api, but users actually using a tool.
- endisneigh 4y agoI’m not sure why you think they’re making an argument - they aren’t claiming anything as far as I can tell
- spiderice 4y agoHow do you figure? They are making an argument that 2.5 billion searches isn't impressive, and Brave is framing it in "yearly searches" so they can use the word "billion" because it doesn't sound as impressive if you frame it in "searches per second".
- endisneigh 4y agoWhere did they say that 2.5 billion isn’t impressive?
- boulos 4y agoSorry, I should have been more clear: I just dislike the use of "billions!!!" when what should be discussed is either qps (system load) or daily-active users (engagement). You could guesstimate DAU from qps by choosing a "queries per day" number (e.g., 10?) and assume the queries are done over just 8 hours. That's 1.25 queries per hour per user. Multiplying these terms out, you get ~500k DAU.
- GoblinSlayer 4y agoBillions queries and 500k DAU indicate that the service is used, they communicate essentially the same information.
- cato_the_elder 4y agoYou probably aren't a fan of Carl Sagan then :-) [1] [1]: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Billions_and_Billions https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Billions_and_Billions
- boulos 4y agoI am! That's billions of a metric that people would agree is "a lot" :). Billions of searches per year is just a weird metric that obscures what you'd actually want to know.