3 ms·
> What we found was that the majority [of C-suite executives] want to do something about it, but they just haven't done something about it I literally laughed
by hansword 4y ago
> What we found was that the majority [of C-suite executives] want to do something about it, but they just haven't done something about it
I literally laughed out loud. This is how it is, this is always how it is. LOL
- Benjammer 4y agoThere are infinite ways to "spin" inaction as cautious analysis or being conservative. It's much more difficult to spin an intentional decision that you are accountable for that went wrong. The higher up you go, the higher the cost of a bad decision becomes, while the value of a correct decision doesn't really increase that much compared to someone lower down making the same call successfully. Basically, you're expected to make the right call more often than not when you are higher up. Amazon literally has a thing in their leadership principles about how good leaders are just "right" more often than bad leaders. All of these incentives lead to many, many situations where it is not in any one executive's best interest to make a decision to move forward on something. So they all just sit on it.
- daxfohl 4y agoI have to give them benefit of the doubt. How many things are on my own plate that I haven't done anything about yet? A lot.
- RemoteIsHeaven 4y ago> How many things are on my own plate that I haven't done anything about yet? A lot sure but that's not how leadership works. Part of leadership is prioritization and ownership.